Aurenoeva Start a requirement
AURENOEVA SIGNATURE METHOD

Acquisition decision workspace

Interactive interface preview using fictional HPLC data. It demonstrates how the public website transitions into the product experience.

Demo data · not a live recommendation
AURENOEVA REQUIREMENT LENS / LIVE REQUIREMENT FIELD
HPLC / QC72% requirement resolution
APPLICATION · ROUTINE QCEVIDENCE · HIGHBUDGET · ≤ €25KGEOGRAPHY · DE / EU
Known7 acquisition-critical fields
Inferred2 assumptions awaiting confirmation
Missing1 question that can change shortlist
IgnoredNon-material questions suppressed
START WITH WHATEVER YOU KNOW

Describe the outcome, model or quote set.

72% requirement resolution
Material question: must the software/CDS licence be transferable and included, or will the buyer provide a validated CDS separately?
91%
Evidence confidenceCandidate AU-LAB-004
IDENTITYVerified
CONFIGSupported
SERVICEVerified
SOFTWAREClaimed
CONFLICTS0 open
ASSET IDENTITY

Agilent 1260 Infinity II HPLC

2021 system · DAD · quaternary pump · autosampler · Germany · seller ask €21,900

AI-generated HPLC illustration
CRITICAL EVIDENCE
Model / serialNameplate image + service record agreeVERIFIED
Manufacture / install dateManufacturer service record supports 2021VERIFIED
DAD detectorConfiguration report and photographs support detector identitySUPPORTED
Qualification historyLatest OQ document present; buyer still needs site-specific qualificationVERIFIED
Software transferSeller states transferable; licence evidence not yet suppliedCLAIMED

Evidence confidence is not “how much the AI likes the asset.” It is a calculation across acquisition-critical facts, their criticality and the quality/relevance of supporting evidence.

DIMENSIONAL RISK STATE

Low–moderate overall, with one commercial dependency.

Identity riskLOW
Model, serial and dates agree across direct evidence.
Technical riskLOW
Required configuration supported; site acceptance still required.
Commercial riskMODERATE
Software entitlement remains seller-claimed.
Supplier riskLOW
Business identity and trading history supported.
Decision rule: if transferable software becomes a hard requirement and no entitlement evidence is provided, the candidate moves to HOLD rather than losing a few cosmetic “score points.”
Decision factorCandidate ACandidate BCandidate C
Hard gatesPASSPASSREJECT — detector mismatch
Fit96%89%
Evidence confidence91%78%84%
RiskLow–moderateModerateHigh
Seller ask€21,900€20,700€18,900
Freight / insurance€540€1,150€780
Inspection / qualification allowance€650€900€1,200
Missing items / remediation€350€1,450€2,600
Comparable acquisition cost€23,440€24,200€23,480
CURRENT RECOMMENDATIONCandidate A — proceed to targeted clarification / inspection.

Best combined acquisition case. Software entitlement remains the only material open point.

PROCEED WITH CONDITION
FIT

Hard gates + weighted criteria

Mandatory requirements cannot be compensated away by other strengths.

EVIDENCE

Critical facts × evidence quality

Direct proof, indirect support, claims, unknowns and conflicts remain distinct states.

RISK

Dimensional state

Identity, technical, regulatory, supplier, commercial and logistics risk stay separately visible.

CAC

Comparable Acquisition Cost

Seller ask + freight + inspection + calibration + missing items + remediation + known allowances.

Auditability
WHY THE NUMBER EXISTS

Every displayed result should be recoverable to the underlying requirement, rule version, evidence object and calculation component. Aurenoeva can use AI for extraction, classification and assistance without turning judgment into an unexplained black-box score.

Rule versionEvidence sourceCriticalityCalculation componentDecision state